摸鱼的最高境界:让代码看起来像在认真工作
摸鱼的最高境界:让代码看起来像在认真工作
程序员的世界里,摸鱼是一门艺术。而最高级的摸鱼,是让代码看起来像在认真工作,甚至骗过同事和老板的眼睛。这需要一些技巧,比如写一些看似复杂实则无用的代码,或者用一些看似高深的技术术语来掩盖实际功能的简单性。
伪装成复杂算法的简单逻辑
有时候,一个简单的逻辑可以通过包装让它看起来像是一个复杂的算法。比如,一个简单的数组求和,可以写成这样:
// 普通写法
const sum = arr => arr.reduce((a, b) => a + b, 0);
// 摸鱼写法
const sophisticatedSum = (inputArray) => {
// 初始化累加器
let accumulator = 0;
// 遍历数组元素
for (let i = 0; i < inputArray.length; i++) {
// 使用位运算优化(虽然并没有什么用)
accumulator = (accumulator ^ inputArray[i]) + (accumulator & inputArray[i]) * 2;
}
// 返回最终结果
return accumulator;
};
后者的代码看起来像是在进行某种高深的数学运算,但实际上和前者功能完全一样。如果再加上一些注释和复杂的变量名,效果会更好。
利用设计模式增加代码复杂度
设计模式是摸鱼的好帮手。比如,你可以用观察者模式来实现一个简单的按钮点击事件:
// 普通写法
button.addEventListener('click', () => {
console.log('Button clicked!');
});
// 摸鱼写法
class ButtonClickSubject {
constructor() {
this.observers = [];
}
subscribe(observer) {
this.observers.push(observer);
}
notify() {
this.observers.forEach(observer => observer.update());
}
}
class ButtonClickObserver {
update() {
console.log('Button clicked!');
}
}
const buttonSubject = new ButtonClickSubject();
const buttonObserver = new ButtonClickObserver();
buttonSubject.subscribe(buttonObserver);
button.addEventListener('click', () => {
buttonSubject.notify();
});
后者用了观察者模式,看起来更"专业",但实际上功能完全一样。如果团队里有人对设计模式不熟悉,可能会觉得这段代码很高端。
创建看似有用的工具函数
编写一些看似有用但实际上很少用到的工具函数也是摸鱼的好方法。比如:
// 将数字转换为中文大写
function numberToChinese(num) {
const chineseNums = ['零', '壹', '贰', '叁', '肆', '伍', '陆', '柒', '捌', '玖'];
const units = ['', '拾', '佰', '仟', '万'];
let result = '';
const str = num.toString();
for (let i = 0; i < str.length; i++) {
const digit = parseInt(str[i]);
const unit = units[str.length - 1 - i];
result += chineseNums[digit] + unit;
}
return result;
}
// 使用示例
console.log(numberToChinese(12345)); // 输出:壹万贰仟叁佰肆拾伍
这个函数看起来很有用,但实际上在大多数项目中根本用不到。但它占用了代码库的空间,看起来像是在做重要的工作。
过度工程化的组件
在前端开发中,我们可以把简单的组件写得非常复杂。比如一个简单的按钮组件:
// 普通按钮组件
function Button({ children, onClick }) {
return <button onClick={onClick}>{children}</button>;
}
// 摸鱼版按钮组件
class AdvancedButton extends React.Component {
static propTypes = {
children: PropTypes.node.isRequired,
onClick: PropTypes.func,
variant: PropTypes.oneOf(['primary', 'secondary', 'tertiary']),
size: PropTypes.oneOf(['sm', 'md', 'lg']),
disabled: PropTypes.bool,
loading: PropTypes.bool,
icon: PropTypes.element,
iconPosition: PropTypes.oneOf(['left', 'right']),
ariaLabel: PropTypes.string,
tabIndex: PropTypes.number,
className: PropTypes.string,
style: PropTypes.object,
dataTestId: PropTypes.string,
};
static defaultProps = {
variant: 'primary',
size: 'md',
disabled: false,
loading: false,
icon: null,
iconPosition: 'left',
onClick: () => {},
ariaLabel: '',
tabIndex: 0,
className: '',
style: {},
dataTestId: 'advanced-button',
};
state = {
isPressed: false,
isHovered: false,
isFocused: false,
};
handleMouseDown = () => {
this.setState({ isPressed: true });
};
handleMouseUp = () => {
this.setState({ isPressed: false });
};
handleMouseEnter = () => {
this.setState({ isHovered: true });
};
handleMouseLeave = () => {
this.setState({ isHovered: false, isPressed: false });
};
handleFocus = () => {
this.setState({ isFocused: true });
};
handleBlur = () => {
this.setState({ isFocused: false });
};
render() {
const {
children,
onClick,
variant,
size,
disabled,
loading,
icon,
iconPosition,
ariaLabel,
tabIndex,
className,
style,
dataTestId,
} = this.props;
const { isPressed, isHovered, isFocused } = this.state;
const buttonClasses = classNames(
'btn',
`btn-${variant}`,
`btn-${size}`,
{
'btn-disabled': disabled,
'btn-loading': loading,
'btn-pressed': isPressed,
'btn-hovered': isHovered,
'btn-focused': isFocused,
},
className
);
return (
<button
className={buttonClasses}
onClick={onClick}
disabled={disabled || loading}
aria-label={ariaLabel}
tabIndex={tabIndex}
style={style}
data-testid={dataTestId}
onMouseDown={this.handleMouseDown}
onMouseUp={this.handleMouseUp}
onMouseEnter={this.handleMouseEnter}
onMouseLeave={this.handleMouseLeave}
onFocus={this.handleFocus}
onBlur={this.handleBlur}
>
{icon && iconPosition === 'left' && (
<span className="btn-icon-left">{icon}</span>
)}
{loading ? 'Loading...' : children}
{icon && iconPosition === 'right' && (
<span className="btn-icon-right">{icon}</span>
)}
</button>
);
}
}
这个按钮组件有各种状态、props验证、事件处理等,看起来非常专业,但实际上大多数项目只需要一个简单的按钮。这种过度工程化的组件会让代码库看起来很庞大,但实际上增加了维护成本。
编写看似高级的TypeScript类型
TypeScript提供了强大的类型系统,可以用来编写一些看起来很高级但实际上可能用不到的类型定义:
// 定义一个深度Partial类型
type DeepPartial<T> = {
[P in keyof T]?: T[P] extends object ? DeepPartial<T[P]> : T[P];
};
// 定义一个递归Required类型
type DeepRequired<T> = {
[P in keyof T]-?: T[P] extends object ? DeepRequired<T[P]> : T[P];
};
// 定义一个条件类型,根据输入类型决定返回类型
type ConditionalType<T> =
T extends string ? { stringValue: T } :
T extends number ? { numberValue: T } :
T extends boolean ? { booleanValue: T } :
{ value: T };
// 定义一个复杂的类型工具
type Flatten<T> = {
[K in keyof T]: T[K] extends infer U ? U : never;
};
// 使用这些类型
interface User {
id: number;
name: string;
address: {
street: string;
city: string;
zip?: string;
};
preferences?: {
theme: 'light' | 'dark';
notifications: boolean;
};
}
type PartialUser = DeepPartial<User>;
type RequiredUser = DeepRequired<User>;
type UserConditional = ConditionalType<User>;
type FlattenedUser = Flatten<User>;
这些类型定义看起来很高级,但实际上在大多数项目中可能根本用不到。它们会让代码看起来更专业,但实际上增加了代码的复杂性。
创建复杂的构建配置
在前端项目中,webpack配置是摸鱼的好地方。你可以创建一个非常复杂的webpack配置,即使项目根本不需要:
// webpack.config.js
const path = require('path');
const webpack = require('webpack');
const HtmlWebpackPlugin = require('html-webpack-plugin');
const MiniCssExtractPlugin = require('mini-css-extract-plugin');
const OptimizeCSSAssetsPlugin = require('optimize-css-assets-webpack-plugin');
const TerserPlugin = require('terser-webpack-plugin');
const { CleanWebpackPlugin } = require('clean-webpack-plugin');
const BundleAnalyzerPlugin = require('webpack-bundle-analyzer').BundleAnalyzerPlugin;
const ForkTsCheckerWebpackPlugin = require('fork-ts-checker-webpack-plugin');
module.exports = (env, argv) => {
const isProduction = argv.mode === 'production';
return {
entry: {
main: './src/index.tsx',
vendor: ['react', 'react-dom'],
},
output: {
path: path.resolve(__dirname, 'dist'),
filename: isProduction ? '[name].[contenthash].js' : '[name].js',
chunkFilename: isProduction ? '[name].[contenthash].chunk.js' : '[name].chunk.js',
publicPath: '/',
},
resolve: {
extensions: ['.ts', '.tsx', '.js', '.json'],
alias: {
'@components': path.resolve(__dirname, 'src/components'),
'@utils': path.resolve(__dirname, 'src/utils'),
'@styles': path.resolve(__dirname, 'src/styles'),
},
},
module: {
rules: [
{
test: /\.(ts|tsx)$/,
exclude: /node_modules/,
use: [
{
loader: 'babel-loader',
options: {
presets: [
'@babel/preset-env',
'@babel/preset-react',
'@babel/preset-typescript',
],
plugins: [
'@babel/plugin-proposal-class-properties',
'@babel/plugin-syntax-dynamic-import',
'lodash',
],
},
},
{
loader: 'ts-loader',
options: {
transpileOnly: true,
experimentalWatchApi: true,
},
},
],
},
{
test: /\.css$/,
use: [
isProduction ? MiniCssExtractPlugin.loader : 'style-loader',
{
loader: 'css-loader',
options: {
modules: {
auto: true,
localIdentName: isProduction
? '[hash:base64]'
: '[path][name]__[local]--[hash:base64:5]',
},
importLoaders: 1,
},
},
'postcss-loader',
],
},
{
test: /\.(png|jpe?g|gif|svg)$/i,
use: [
{
loader: 'url-loader',
options: {
limit: 8192,
name: isProduction
? 'assets/[name].[contenthash].[ext]'
: 'assets/[name].[ext]',
},
},
{
loader: 'image-webpack-loader',
options: {
mozjpeg: {
progressive: true,
quality: 65,
},
optipng: {
enabled: false,
},
pngquant: {
quality: [0.65, 0.90],
speed: 4,
},
gifsicle: {
interlaced: false,
},
webp: {
quality: 75,
},
},
},
],
},
],
},
optimization: {
minimize: isProduction,
minimizer: [
new TerserPlugin({
parallel: true,
terserOptions: {
ecma: 2015,
compress: {
drop_console: isProduction,
},
output: {
comments: false,
},
},
extractComments: false,
}),
new OptimizeCSSAssetsPlugin({}),
],
splitChunks: {
chunks: 'all',
minSize: 30000,
maxSize: 244000,
minChunks: 1,
maxAsyncRequests: 5,
maxInitialRequests: 3,
automaticNameDelimiter: '~',
cacheGroups: {
vendors: {
test: /[\\/]node_modules[\\/]/,
priority: -10,
},
default: {
minChunks: 2,
priority: -20,
reuseExistingChunk: true,
},
},
},
runtimeChunk: {
name: 'runtime',
},
},
plugins: [
new CleanWebpackPlugin(),
new HtmlWebpackPlugin({
template: './public/index.html',
minify: isProduction
? {
removeComments: true,
collapseWhitespace: true,
removeRedundantAttributes: true,
useShortDoctype: true,
removeEmptyAttributes: true,
removeStyleLinkTypeAttributes: true,
keepClosingSlash: true,
minifyJS: true,
minifyCSS: true,
minifyURLs: true,
}
: false,
}),
new MiniCssExtractPlugin({
filename: isProduction ? '[name].[contenthash].css' : '[name].css',
chunkFilename: isProduction ? '[id].[contenthash].css' : '[id].css',
}),
new webpack.DefinePlugin({
'process.env.NODE_ENV': JSON.stringify(argv.mode),
}),
new ForkTsCheckerWebpackPlugin(),
...(isProduction ? [new BundleAnalyzerPlugin()] : []),
],
devtool: isProduction ? 'source-map' : 'cheap-module-eval-source-map',
devServer: {
contentBase: path.join(__dirname, 'dist'),
compress: true,
port: 9000,
hot: true,
historyApiFallback: true,
overlay: true,
stats: 'minimal',
clientLogLevel: 'warning',
proxy: {
'/api': {
target: 'http://localhost:3000',
secure: false,
changeOrigin: true,
},
},
},
performance: {
hints: isProduction ? 'warning' : false,
maxAssetSize: 244000,
maxEntrypointSize: 244000,
},
};
};
这个webpack配置包含了各种优化、插件和loader,看起来非常专业。但实际上,对于一个小型项目来说,可能只需要一个简单的配置就够了。这种复杂的配置会让项目看起来更"企业级",但实际上可能增加了构建时间和维护难度。
编写看似重要的测试代码
测试代码也是摸鱼的好地方。你可以编写一些看似重要但实际上测试的是非常明显功能的测试:
// 测试一个简单的工具函数
describe('StringUtils', () => {
describe('capitalize', () => {
it('should capitalize the first letter of a string', () => {
expect(capitalize('hello')).toBe('Hello');
});
it('should return empty string when input is empty', () => {
expect(capitalize('')).toBe('');
});
it('should handle single character strings', () => {
expect(capitalize('a')).toBe('A');
});
it('should not modify already capitalized strings', () => {
expect(capitalize('Hello')).toBe('Hello');
});
it('should handle strings with leading spaces', () => {
expect(capitalize(' hello')).toBe(' hello');
});
it('should handle strings with numbers', () => {
expect(capitalize('1hello')).toBe('1hello');
});
it('should handle strings with special characters', () => {
expect(capitalize('@hello')).toBe('@hello');
});
it('should handle unicode characters', () => {
expect(capitalize('éllo')).toBe('Éllo');
});
});
});
// 测试一个React组件
describe('Button Component', () => {
it('should render without crashing', () => {
const div = document.createElement('div');
ReactDOM.render(<Button />, div);
ReactDOM.unmountComponentAtNode(div);
});
it('should render children correctly', () => {
const wrapper = shallow(<Button>Click me</Button>);
expect(wrapper.text()).toBe('Click me');
});
it('should call onClick when clicked', () => {
const onClick = jest.fn();
const wrapper = shallow(<Button onClick={onClick} />);
wrapper.simulate('click');
expect(onClick).toHaveBeenCalled();
});
it('should not call onClick when disabled', () => {
const onClick = jest.fn();
const wrapper = shallow(<Button onClick={onClick} disabled />);
wrapper.simulate('click');
expect(onClick).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
it('should have correct class when variant is primary', () => {
const wrapper = shallow(<Button variant="primary" />);
expect(wrapper.hasClass('btn-primary')).toBe(true);
});
it('should have correct class when size is large', () => {
const wrapper = shallow(<Button size="lg" />);
expect(wrapper.hasClass('btn-lg')).toBe(true);
});
it('should render icon when provided', () => {
const icon = <span className="icon" />;
const wrapper = shallow(<Button icon={icon} />);
expect(wrapper.find('.icon').exists()).toBe(true);
});
it('should match snapshot', () => {
const tree = renderer.create(<Button>Click me</Button>).toJSON();
expect(tree).toMatchSnapshot();
});
});
这些测试看起来很全面,但实际上测试的都是一些非常基本的功能。它们会增加测试覆盖率,让代码看起来更可靠,但实际上可能并没有测试到真正复杂的逻辑。
编写看似复杂的文档
最后,编写一些看似复杂但实际上内容很少的文档
本站部分内容来自互联网,一切版权均归源网站或源作者所有。
如果侵犯了你的权益请来信告知我们删除。邮箱:cc@cccx.cn